File #: 14-0035    Version: 1 Name: Crown Castle NG West, Inc. V. City Of Oakland
Type: City Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 9/11/2014 In control: Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Agency / City Council
On agenda: Final action: 9/23/2014
Title: Subject: Crown Castle NG West, Inc. V. City Of Oakland From: Office Of The City Attorney Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Approving Settlement Of Crown Castle Ng West, Inc. V. City Of Oakland Et Al. (Alameda Superior I Court Case No. Rg12617055), By Accepting The Trial Court's Judgment That The City Cannot Charge Rent, And Must Issue Encroachment Permits, For Crown 4 Castle To Install Telecommunications Equipment In City Rights-Of-Way At Two Locations, Pursuant To Previously Approved Conditional Use Permits, In Exchange For Crown Castle (A) Dismissing Its Cause Of Action Challenging Oakland Planning Code Regulations Governing The Siting Of Wireless Telecommunication $.Facilities And (B) Accepting Reasonable Conditions For The Two Locations Pursuant To Encroachment Permits
Attachments: 1. View Report.pdf, 2. 85169 CMS.pdf
Title
Subject:      Crown Castle NG West, Inc. V. City Of Oakland       
From:            Office Of The City Attorney
Recommendation:  Adopt A Resolution Approving Settlement Of Crown Castle Ng West, Inc. V. City Of Oakland Et Al. (Alameda Superior I Court Case No. Rg12617055), By Accepting The Trial Court's Judgment That The City Cannot Charge Rent, And Must Issue Encroachment Permits, For Crown 4 Castle To Install Telecommunications Equipment In City Rights-Of-Way At Two Locations, Pursuant To Previously Approved Conditional Use Permits, In Exchange For Crown Castle (A) Dismissing Its Cause Of Action Challenging Oakland Planning Code Regulations Governing The Siting Of Wireless Telecommunication $.Facilities And (B) Accepting Reasonable Conditions For The Two Locations Pursuant To Encroachment Permits