3.1
Subject: Tom O’Neill, Mabel Paige V. City Of Oakland, A Municipal Corporation,
Nakiah M. Ward, Does 1 To 50
From:
Office Of The City Attorney
Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To
Compromise And Settle The Cases Of Tom O’Neill And Mabel Paige V. City Of Oakland,
A Municipal Corporation, Nakiah M. Ward, Does 1 To 50, Alameda County Superior
Court Case Nos. 23CV035142, 23CV035146, City Attorney File Nos. 35480, 35480-1,
In The Sum Of One Hundred Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($100,000.00)
(Department Of Transportation - Dangerous Condition Of Public Property)
Office Of The City Attorney
Sponsors:
A Rule 24 Was Read Into Record And Accepted
On Consent
This City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Special Concurrent Meeting
of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency/City Council to be heard
3/16/2026
3.2
Subject: Filmon Hagos V. The City Of Oakland, A Public Entity, The County Of
Alameda, A Public Entity, First Presbyterian Church Of Oakland, A Nonprofit Religious
Corporation; And Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive
From:
Office Of The City Attorney
Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To
Compromise And Settle The Case Of Filmon Hagos V. The City Of Oakland, A Public
Entity, The County Of Alameda, A Public Entity, First Presbyterian Church Of Oakland, A
Nonprofit Religious Corporation; And Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Alameda County
Superior Court Case No. 23CV046388, City Attorney File No. 36395, In The Sum Of Two
Hundred And Fifty Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($250,000.00), Payable To Filmon
Hagos And His Attorneys At Harris Personal Injury Lawyers (Oakland Department Of
Transportation - Dangerous Condition)
Office Of The City Attorney
Sponsors:
A Rule 24 Was Read Into Record And Accepted
On Consent
This City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Special Concurrent Meeting
of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency/City Council to be heard
3/16/2026